[rules-users] Resolution to JBRULES-2837 possible?

Hi, I am hesitating on making a recommendation to use the jBPM 5.0 based on Drools due to the bug https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-2837 https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-2837 JBRULES-2837 not being resolved since November. I have seen one workaround posted to the forums regarding creating a stateful session per process invocation. I have a concern that this would wreak havoc with persistence. The other solution I have seen is to use a stateful session per thread. I know that is not viable due to the fact that a thread may exit the session due to use of an asynchronous domain specific language work item. I see progress has been made on JBRULES-2837 though it has not been closed. I have considered using a pool of stateful sessions as a stop-gap. Could be viable? Would still be a pain persistence wise, but maybe doable? Is there at least a plan in place for resolution? I want this to work. Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Resolution-to-JBRULES-2837-possible-tp2... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.