12:58 p.m.
I can anticipate the answer where OP says that there is a constraint
restricting argVolume to > 0. However, I don't think that independent
constraints such as we see them in this rule are evaluated as if they
were in a single logical expression, with Java semantics.
The seductive possibility of binding to a half-baked expression (i.e.,
$ratio:(volumeAccumulations["total"]/consolidatdVolume.avgVolume))
should be discarded. This value can safely be computed on the RHS
where the denominator's value being !=0 is asserted.
-W
On 01/11/2013, Stephen Masters <stephen.masters(a)me.com> wrote:
Divide by zero exceptions usually occur when you try to divide by
zero.
So … first question … is consolidatdVolume.avgVolume ever zero?
On 1 Nov 2013, at 16:17, gboro54 <gboro54(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> I have rules like the following:
>
> rule "Add Baseline to Context if it does not exists exists or not greater
> then 0"
> no-loop true
> when
> $context:Context($id:id,baselineParticipation==null ||
>
> baselineParticipation.baselineRatio==null||baselineParticipation.baselineRatio==0)
> then
> modify($firm) {setBaselineParticipation(new
> BaselineParticipation($id,new
> BigDecimal(0.00485)))};
>
> end
>
> rule "Calculate Participation Ratio"
> no-loop true
> when
> $context:Context(consolidatdVolume!=null,consolidatdVolume.avgVolume>0,
>
volumeAccumulations["total"]!=null,volumeAccumulations["total"]>0,
> $ratio:(volumeAccumulations["total"]/consolidatdVolume.avgVolume))
> then
> ConcurrentMap calculatedRatios=$firm.getCalculatedRatios();
> calculatedRatios.put("fparticipationRatio",new BigDecimal($ratio));
> modify($firm){setCalculatedRatios(calculatedRatios)};
> end
>
> Despite the checks I get the following exception and any insight into why
> would be great:
>
> Exception executing consequence for rule "Calculate Firm Participation
> Ratio" in com.nasdaq.rms.nq.status: java.lang.ArithmeticException: / by
> zero
> Exception executing consequence for rule "Calculate Firm Participation
> Ratio" in com.nasdaq.rms.nq.status: java.lang.ArithmeticException: / by
> zero
> at
>
org.drools.runtime.rule.impl.DefaultConsequenceExceptionHandler.handleException(DefaultConsequenceExceptionHandler.java:39)
> at
> org.drools.common.DefaultAgenda.fireActivation(DefaultAgenda.java:1297)
> at org.drools.common.DefaultAgenda.fireNextItem(DefaultAgenda.java:1221)
> at org.drools.common.DefaultAgenda.fireAllRules(DefaultAgenda.java:1456)
> at
> org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.fireAllRules(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:710)
> at
> org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.fireAllRules(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:674)
> at
>
org.drools.impl.StatefulKnowledgeSessionImpl.fireAllRules(StatefulKnowledgeSessionImpl.java:230)
> at
>
com.nasdaq.fq.rms.workflow.processor.rules.PerformanceStatusAssignmentProcessor.doWork(PerformanceStatusAssignmentProcessor.java:156)
> at com.ften.ssr.workqueue.WorkItemRunnable.run(WorkItemRunnable.java:48)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:724)
> Caused by: java.lang.ArithmeticException: / by zero
> at ConditionEvaluatorda6271cf5a744b6bbdb9c717cae2edb7.evaluate(Unknown
> Source)
> at
> org.drools.rule.constraint.MvelConstraint.evaluate(MvelConstraint.java:200)
> at
> org.drools.rule.constraint.MvelConstraint.isAllowed(MvelConstraint.java:157)
> at org.drools.reteoo.AlphaNode.modifyObject(AlphaNode.java:154)
> at
>
org.drools.reteoo.CompositeObjectSinkAdapter.doPropagateModifyObject(CompositeObjectSinkAdapter.java:507)
> at
>
org.drools.reteoo.CompositeObjectSinkAdapter.propagateModifyObject(CompositeObjectSinkAdapter.java:432)
> at org.drools.reteoo.AlphaNode.modifyObject(AlphaNode.java:157)
> at
>
org.drools.reteoo.CompositeObjectSinkAdapter.doPropagateModifyObject(CompositeObjectSinkAdapter.java:507)
> at
>
org.drools.reteoo.CompositeObjectSinkAdapter.propagateModifyObject(CompositeObjectSinkAdapter.java:432)
> at
> org.drools.reteoo.ObjectTypeNode.modifyObject(ObjectTypeNode.java:314)
> at
> org.drools.reteoo.EntryPointNode.modifyObject(EntryPointNode.java:265)
> at org.drools.common.NamedEntryPoint.update(NamedEntryPoint.java:483)
> at org.drools.common.NamedEntryPoint.update(NamedEntryPoint.java:383)
> at
> org.drools.base.DefaultKnowledgeHelper.update(DefaultKnowledgeHelper.java:337)
> at
>
com.nasdaq.rms.nq.status.Rule_Calculate_Firm_Participation_Ratio_cfb033f33c2b404fb2bff8e1b9af0175.defaultConsequence(Unknown
> Source)
> at
>
com.nasdaq.rms.nq.status.Rule_Calculate_Firm_Participation_Ratio_cfb033f33c2b404fb2bff8e1b9af0175DefaultConsequenceInvokerGenerated.evaluate(Unknown
> Source)
> at
>
com.nasdaq.rms.nq.status.Rule_Calculate_Firm_Participation_Ratio_cfb033f33c2b404fb2bff8e1b9af0175DefaultConsequenceInvoker.evaluate(Unknown
> Source)
> at
> org.drools.common.DefaultAgenda.fireActivation(DefaultAgenda.java:1287)
> ... 10 more
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-5-5-divide-by-0-exception-tp4026...
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users