RE: [rules-users] does WorkingMemory.iterator support remove()?

Wouldn't the best approach be to get the FactHandles iterator and retact them from working memory rather than removing them through the iterator? Iterator itr = wm.iterateFactHandles(); While(itr.next()) { FactHandle h = itr.next(); wm.retract(h); } This would ensure truth maintenance is preserved. -----Original Message----- From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Godmar Back Sent: 05 October 2007 16:40 To: Rules Users List Subject: Re: [rules-users] does WorkingMemory.iterator support remove()? Thanks - consider supporting it for efficiency. (Otherwise, removing a set of facts from working memory requires a temporary container to hold the facts to be removed.) - Godmar On 10/5/07, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org&gt; wrote: "UnsupportedOperationException" http://anonsvn.labs.jboss.com/labs/jbossrules/trunk/drools-core/src/main/jav a/org/drools/util/JavaIteratorAdapter.java > > Please answer and augment documentation. > > > - Godmar > > _______________________________________________ > > rules-users mailing list > > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users