Personally, I don't find the user list "high volume".
Perhaps re-categorizing the mailing lists we have works better:-
- users: newbie type stuff
- dev (rename drools-tech?): technical questions (not just
implementation)
My 2c.
On 15 August 2012 00:33, Salaboy <salaboy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Probably a linked in private group can do the job, I dont know if it
supports all the features that you mention but at least you have the
contacts network to checks who joins and post new topics. With a group of
moderators the topics can be restricted easily
Sent from my iPhone
On 14 Aug 2012, at 22:48, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org> wrote:
> As the user list is now high volume, i'm contemplating an "invite
only"
expert list. I'm not sure who this would work, or if it's practical. But
the idea is to have a lower volume list, with a higher quality of technical
questions and discussions. This might make it easier for people to be
engaged.
>
> I'm thinking of doing it as a google group "drools-expert-group" or
something.
>
> I'm not entirely sure how to decide who gets an invite or not…. as it's
very arbitrary. I guess in general anyone who gets a recommendation for
someone on the list, gets an invite. But I'm open to other ideas to run
this.
>
> Ideally we should be able to setup a number of moderators, that can
handle this invite list, including people from the community. Although not
sure if google groups supports this, need to find out.
>
> Anyway would like to here what people think, and would be interest to
see alternative ways to do this. Maybe you can point to existing setups,
that manage this sort of situation, that we can copy?
>
> Mark
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users