Re: [rules-users] Moving comment in DSLR file causes issue under 5.3

Thanks. I think this is actualy a bug in 5.3. I wonder if there is an issue with the mvel getting unsynchronized as files get larger? The # should indicate a comment and > should indicate something passed thru to DROOLS directly. So almost the entire rule is commented out. I am particuarly puzzled why moving the offending statement to the left hand side removes the 2 errors - "fp1 cannot be resolved to a variable" and "x cannot be resolved to a variable". -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Moving-comment-in-DSLR-file-causes-issu... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.