Re: [rules-users] "in" syntax breaking the Rete Tree
"We saw this message..." - then why wasn't the advice given to raise a bug
earlier? Why did it take 8 posts to eventually get to that point? It's a
waste of time and effort, and a lack of appreciation for people who are
trying to promote your product in their industry and workplace.
When you tell people they are wasting your time, and you accuse them of not appreciating
you, that is abusive behaviour. It adds nothing to the technical discussions in this list,
and is simply venting of your frustrations. This is not acceptable, and it is my job to
make sure it does not happen.
Mark
On 24 Feb 2014, at 15:56, droolster <quant.coder(a)gmail.com> wrote:
@Mark, like I said in my previous post, "when you get off your
high-horse"...
you may see things differently.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/in-operator-breaking-the-Rete-Tree-tp40...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users