Re: [rules-users] Access to globals from WorkItemHandlers?

tolitius wrote: Anatoly, It would, technically. It's actually a marketing problem that I'm trying to avoid! We are by no means settled on Drools. There are a lot of horror stories about rule-engine performance, and Drools in particular. I'm sure that most of them are based on bad design choices... but I'd like to avoid any smell of unnecessary rule-engine overhead. You probably can see where I'm going... in a forward-chaining engine like Drools, every introduction or mutation of a variable requires matching against the active rules. In the context of a normal workflow, I believe that this overhead is ridiculously trivial in the kind of use-case I've been talking about. But I'd prefer to avoid the discussion altogether! -Ed -- View this message in context: http://n3.nabble.com/Access-to-globals-from-WorkItemHandlers-tp732460p733... Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.