There is no such thing as non-short-circuit evaluation in patterns or
constraints.
Please explain why you want that, preferably while providing a
non-schematic example.
-W
On 29/01/2013, mp <meitreyi.panchmia(a)morganstanley.com> wrote:
Hi,
I need to use non-short circuit ANDing (&) for my rules.
However, for a rules like (conditionA & conditionB) I get the following
error:
"Predicate 'conditionA & conditionB' must be a Boolean expression"
(conditionA && conditionB) works fine. But it short circuits the
conditions.
Any ideas as to what I could be doing wrong or how I can ensure that
condition2 is evaluated irrespective of whether condition1 is true or
false?
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Non-short-circuit-ANDing-tp4021928.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users