Re: [rules-users] Division Operator in a Rule Condition
Check the "Expert" manual. What you need here is a so-called "Return Value
Restriction" where you relate a field and a parenthesized expression using a
relational operator; i.e.: <field> <op> ( <expr> )
Therefore, $b/$c <= 105 is not correct, but $b <= ( 105*$c ) is (apart from
possible truncation if $b and $c are integers).
-W
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:20 PM, skasab2s <skasab2s(a)smail.inf.fh-brs.de>wrote:
Hello guys,
I have this problem:
I have an object A with fields b and c. I have to check if b/c <= 105 (if
the division of the both fields is less than 105).
When I try the condition A ($b:b, $c:c, $b/$c <=105), I get the error
message "No viable alternative for /".
How to check this one correctly in a rule condition?
Thanks a lot for any ideas!
skasab2s
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Division-Operator-in-a-Rule-Condition-tp25716712p25...
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 1.8 KB)