Re: [rules-users] Rules categorization/packages

https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/GUVNOR-514 Model is also there :) 2010/3/17 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti(a)gmail.com&gt; It would be good too if you could provide us your model (or at least a part > of it). > > Best, > > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Toni Rikkola <trikkola(a)redhat.com&gt;wrote: > >> You can create a Jira for this and upload the jar file there. >> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/GUVNOR >> >> We will take a look at it and fix it if it is a bug. >> >> Toni >> >> Amit Kumar wrote: >> > Sorry for spamming today >> > It does seem to be working after I add "Any of the following" or "All >> > of the following" and then add the attributes to it. So workaround is >> > there.. >> > But when I add "There is a Equipment" and add a attribute then it >> > permits me to assign a variable to it >> > like Equipment(eId : entityId) >> > but it does not "correctly" give me that variable assigning capability >> > in the "Any of " or "All of" blocks .. so struck issue. >> > Thanks, >> > Amit >> > >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Amit Kumar <amitkumar(a)gmail.com >> > <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>> wrote: >> > >> > Ok I tried again. :( >> > >> > In Equipment I only see manufacturer >> > In EquipmentCA I also only see manufacturer >> > In Software I do not see anything. >> > >> > It contains many more classes >> > >> > Not sure what I am breaking.. but if you want I can send you my >> > model files to you (in case you want to try). Do not want to post >> > it on alias >> > >> > Thanks >> > Amit >> > >> > >> > 2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti(a)gmail.com >> > <mailto:esteban.aliverti@gmail.com>> >> > >> > But, which fields didn't appear in guvnor? >> > >> > 2010/3/16 Amit Kumar <amitkumar(a)gmail.com >> > <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>> >> > >> > Probably because of OStype and OSversion. Let me fix that >> > and convert to lower case and try. I remember facing this >> > issue sometime back with 5.0 >> > Thanks >> > Amit >> > >> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Amit Kumar >> > <amitkumar(a)gmail.com <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>> wrote: >> > >> > Its coming from a JAR >> > Thanks >> > Amit >> > >> > Equipment >> > entityId int >> > partNumber String >> > manufacturer String >> > owningEntityId int >> > >> > >> > >> > Software >> > entityId int >> > OSType String >> > OSVersion String >> > imageName String >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > EquipmentCA extends Equipment >> > hostname String >> > productName String >> > productFamily String >> > productId String >> > >> > 2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti(a)gmail.com >> > <mailto:esteban.aliverti@gmail.com>> >> > >> > Are you importing your model from a .jar or using >> > a Declarative Model? >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Toni Rikkola >> > <trikkola(a)redhat.com <mailto:trikkola@redhat.com>> >> > wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > Its possible that there are some bugs in the >> > snapshots. Can you tell me >> > what your model looks like? >> > >> > Toni >> > >> > Amit Kumar wrote: >> > > The latest builds seem to be no good for >> guvnor >> > > They do seem rich in features .. especially >> > support for >> > > collect/accumulate in guvnor along with >> > inbox and global packages. >> > > >> > > But But But.. on adding a fact in the >> > when/then clause then all the >> > > attributes of the facts are not coming .. >> > some attributes come.. not >> > > all of them. >> > > I am picking it from here >> > > >> > >> https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/t... >> > > Any other place I can look :) >> > > >> > > Thanks >> > > Amit >> > > >> > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Amit Kumar >> > <amitkumar(a)gmail.com <mailto: >> amitkumar(a)gmail.com&gt; >> > > <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com >> > <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>>> wrote: >> > > >> > > Thanks Jervis!! >> > > >> > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:05 PM, >> > Jervisliu <jliu(a)redhat.com >> > <mailto:jliu@redhat.com> >> > > <mailto:jliu@redhat.com >> > <mailto:jliu@redhat.com>>> wrote: >> > > >> > > A new feature called "Sharable >> > artifacts/Global artifacts" will be >> > > available in Drools 5.1. This >> > feature allows you share an >> > > asset among >> > > different packages. It also creates >> > a global area (you can >> > > consider it >> > > as a global package). Potentially >> > you can promote an asset >> > > that you >> > > think is more appropriate to be >> > defined in a global scope from >> > > your >> > > current package to the global area, >> > so that this global asset >> > > can be >> > > reused by every package. This >> > feature is already on trunk, >> > > maybe you >> > > want to give it a try. Any comments >> > or feedbacks will be highly >> > > appreciated. >> > > >> > > Cheers, >> > > Jervis >> > > >> > > >> > > Amit Kumar wrote: >> > > > Hello All, >> > > > >> > > > I am looking to organize the rules >> > in different categories. >> > > But for >> > > > distribution purposes We are >> > creating packages for different >> > > > roles/processing phases >> > > > >> > > > So a rule will reside in one >> > pckage but for navigation it >> > > can belong >> > > > to multiple categories >> > > > >> > > > So packages are like Shirts, >> > Pants, Shoes, Sweaters >> > > > Categories are Color, Material, >> > Size, Gender and those have sub >> > > > categories witin them >> > > > >> > > > We have rules which will device >> > the category of the item >> > > > Like "red rule", "blue rule", >> > "cloth rule", leather rule" >> > > > >> > > > Now the problem we are facing is >> > for category rules is if I >> > > define the >> > > > rule in Shirt package .. then I >> > will not be able ot use it >> > > in Pant >> > > > package.. Will have to redefine it. >> > > > >> > > > The other problem in this scenario >> > is If I have a price rule >> > > in Shirt >> > > > package and the category is "Blue >> > Color" and "XL Size" then >> > > I will >> > > > have to put it in both categories >> > > > When I put the "Blue Rule" on >> > "Blue Category" and "XL Rule" >> > > on "XL >> > > > Category" and I put the rule in >> > both categories.. will it >> > > be an "and" >> > > > relationship or will be an "OR" >> > > > >> > > > Regards, >> > > > Amit >> > > > >> > > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > > > >> > > > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > > > rules-users mailing list >> > > > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org >> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> >> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org >> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>> >> > > > >> > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > > rules-users mailing list >> > > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org >> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> >> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org >> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>> >> > > >> > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ >> > > rules-users mailing list >> > > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org >> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> >> > > >> > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> > > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > rules-users mailing list >> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org >> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> >> > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX >> > >> > Esteban Aliverti >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > rules-users mailing list >> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org >> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> >> > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > rules-users mailing list >> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org >> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX >> > >> > Esteban Aliverti >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > rules-users mailing list >> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto: >> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> > >> > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > rules-users mailing list >> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-users mailing list >> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> > > > > -- > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > > Esteban Aliverti > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users