Re: [rules-users] controling rule execution
Thanks Greg.
child rule should be reactivated if parent's conditions for some other fact
are false.
this should happen for each fact. Parent's condition should decide whether
child rule should be executed or not for each fact. If parent's conditions
are true, then don't execute child rule and vice versa.
Greg Barton wrote:
A combination of higher priority parent rules with a custom agenda filter,
activated when the parent rule fires, that prevents the child rule from
firing.
Just a guess.
So, after the child rule is initially prevented from firing, can it be
reactivated? If so, when and under what conditions?
--- On Thu, 10/30/08, techy <techluver007(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> From: techy <techluver007(a)gmail.com>
> Subject: [rules-users] controling rule execution
> To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> Date: Thursday, October 30, 2008, 11:18 PM
> Hello,
>
> I would like to have the rules parent/child structure. I
> don't want the
> child rules to be executed when parent's conditions
> are true(i.e
> consequence is executed) even if child's conditions
> are true. How Can I
> achieve that in drools?
> Please clarify.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/controling-rule-execution-tp20260028p20260028.html
> Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/controling-rule-execution-tp20260028p20265921.html
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.