Re: [rules-users] Rules not firing when facts asserted in a rule RHS in 5.0 - diagnosed with workaround (but not fixed)

Hi Chris, could you attach the repository export xml from your repo that I can use to reproduce the issue with? BRMS 5.1 (supported bits) is right around the corner and I would be able to tell you if the issue still persists with the currently tested bits for 5.1. Thanks. Tihomir On 12/1/10 4:29 PM, Chris Selwyn wrote: > Having spent all day on this one, I have finally got to the bottom of it. > > The problem is reproducible if I have /both/ a declarative fact model > /and/ a function in my rules. > It doesn't matter whether the function is called or not... It's > presence is enough to cause the problem. > > Any rule that is dependent on the existence of an instance of the > declarative fact model where the instance is created in the RHS of > another rule will not fire. > > I suspect that this is a bug that has been fixed in 5.1 because I > have been using this technique in Drools 5.1... It's only since > downgrading to the (supported) JBoss Rules 5.0 that I have > experienced the problem. > > Does anyone know if there is a fix in the 5.0 branch? > > If I create a "real" Java class and upload it in a jar file to the > Guvnor and use that in place of the declarative model then the > problem does not happen. > This is a workaround in the short term but I would much prefer not to > have to do this. > > Chris Selwyn > > > On 01/12/2010 15:14, Chris Selwyn wrote: >> Yes the package is "SWWB2BOutgoing" but it looks as though the >> package name simple doesn't get reported in the log file. >> >> I have been debugging through this thing and where I've got to so >> far is that I am getting two (and maybe more) entries for the class >> "SWWB2BOutgoing.QuestionValidation" in the >> ObjectTypeConfigurationRepository. >> So my current question is "How is this possible?" Is it maybe a >> classloader issue? >> >> Chris >> >> >> On 01/12/2010 12:05, Wolfgang Laun wrote: >>> A closer look: >>> >>> On 1 December 2010 11:13, Chris Selwyn <chris(a)selwyn-family.me.uk >>> <mailto:chris@selwyn-family.me.uk>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> I can see the facts being inserted in the log as follows >>> [#|2010-12-01T09:19:16.723+0000|INFO|sun-appserver2.1|javax.enterprise.system.stream.out|_ThreadID=70;_ThreadName=p: >>> thread-pool-1; w: 7;| >>> OBJECT ASSERTED value:QuestionValidation( mandatory=true, >>> state=Closed, >>> question=B2B_METER_SERIAL_NUMBER, type=string ) factId: 39|#] >>> >>> >>> Shouldn't the package name appear in the log as well? >>> >>> >>> However, if I insert a QuestionValidation fact created in Java >>> by using >>> kbase.getFactType("SWWB2BOutgoing", "QuestionValidation") then >>> the Test >>> rule gets fired just fine. >>> >>> >>> That is, apparently "SWWB2BOutgoing". >>> >>> -W >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rules-users mailing list >>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>> >>> >>> No virus found in this message. >>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com> >>> Version: 10.0.1170 / Virus Database: 426/3290 - Release Date: 11/30/10 >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-users mailing list >> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> >> >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com> >> Version: 10.0.1170 / Virus Database: 426/3290 - Release Date: 11/30/10 >> > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com> Version: 10.0.1170 / Virus Database: 426/3291 - Release Date: 12/01/10