Re: [rules-users] does WorkingMemory.iterator support remove()?
Thanks - consider supporting it for efficiency. (Otherwise, removing a
set of facts from working memory requires a temporary container to
hold the facts to be removed.)
- Godmar
On 10/5/07, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org> wrote:
Godmar Back wrote:
> Does the iterator returned by WorkingMemory.iterator support remove()?
>
> I checked the javadoc and the Drools manual, but may have missed it.
>
If you try it you'll get an exception thrown
"UnsupportedOperationException"
http://anonsvn.labs.jboss.com/labs/jbossrules/trunk/drools-core/src/main/...
> Please answer and augment documentation.
>
> - Godmar
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users