Just a random thought but would the declarative agenda (for 5.3?) provide
any help?
sent on the move
On 18 Nov 2011 21:23, "Jamie" <jshaw(a)llbean.com> wrote:
I don't think you can reference a fact in the enabled condition.
There's
also no way to get a reference to the current rule like you can in the RHS,
which is why I had to hard code the name.
Vincent, thanks for the comment out the inheritance. I think that would
work well for icechunk. I had forgotten about that feature. I've been
searching for way to log when a rule was being evaluated and the best I've
come up with is an eval() statement that writes a log message. It feels
like a hack and I didn't want to clutter all of my rules with it, but
inheritance would let me centralize that logging if I create a base rule
that all other rules extend from. I'll have to look further into that.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Exclude-certain-rules-tp3517185p3519741...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users