There are multiple orders with flowId == 1798. If I remove the
activation-group I believe that 2 orders are processed by the rule with
their specific stage as well as the last rule and any orders that don't
meet the stage criteria will trigger the last rule. Without the
activation-group all orders are processed, some multiple times.
My understanding of the manual is that if I have X number of rules that
belong to the activation-group with various salience values that each
Order will be processed by the rules and the one with the highest
salience will be fired and the rest will be ignored. Once that's
complete the next order will come through and repeat the process. What
I'm experiencing is that the first order to trigger any rule in that
activation-group will disable the entire activation group and no further
orders will be processed.
-----Original Message-----
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Anstis,
Michael (M.)
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 6:45 AM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: RE: [rules-users] activation-group
Do you have multiple Orders with a flowId == 1798?
What if you remove the activation-group (for testing) do multiple Orders
get processed (all be it, possibly, each one multiple times)?
If not it could point towards a problem with either the implementation
or understanding of activation-groups (from the manual):-
Rules that belong to the same named activation-group will only fire
exclusively. In other words, the first rule in an activation-group to
fire will cancel the other rules activations (stop them from firing).
The Activation group attribute is any string, as long as the string is
identical for all the rules you need to be in the one group.
Does this mean one rule in the activation group will fire for all
asserted facts or one in the group per asserted fact?
I've not used activation-groups so my questions aren't necessarily aimed
at you Joe.
-----Original Message-----
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Bynum, Joe
Sent: 25 April 2007 18:10
To: Rules Users List
Subject: RE: [rules-users] activation-group
I'm not making any changes to the orders at all if that's what you're
thinking.
[when]workflow in stage "{value}"=order : Order( stages contains
"{value}" ) [when]order is {value}=order: Order( id == {value} )
[when]flowid is {value}=order: Order( flowId == {value} ) [when]workflow
in stage "{value}"=order: Order( stages contains "{value}" );
[then]assign prov plan=OTISHelper.assignProvPlan(
order.getDocumentNumber(), order.getProvPlanName() ); [then]complete
task "{value}"=OTISHelper.completeProvPlanTask(
order.getDocumentNumber(), "{value}", "JAVATEAM",
"JWB_TEST" );
[when]workflow isnt in stage "{value}"=order: Order( stages excludes
"{value}" ); [when]has provplan=order : Order( provPlanName != "" )
[when]order type isnt "{value}"=order : Order( orderType != "{value}"
)
-----Original Message-----
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Anstis,
Michael (M.)
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 10:06 AM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: RE: [rules-users] activation-group
Any chance you can post your DSL too?
-----Original Message-----
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Bynum, Joe
Sent: 25 April 2007 14:39
To: Rules Users List
Subject: RE: [rules-users] activation-group
Anyone have any idea what I'm doing wrong?
-----Original Message-----
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Bynum, Joe
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 1:50 PM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: RE: [rules-users] activation-group
I've read the manual but as I stated below only the first order seems to
trigger a rule. The other orders are completely ignored. I would
expect one rule in the group to trigger for each order.
-----Original Message-----
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of JLL
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 11:38 AM
To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: Re: [rules-users] activation-group
from documentation
3.5.3.5. activation-group
default value N/A
type : String
Rules that belong to the same named activation-group will only fire
exclusively. In other words, the first rule in an activation-group to
fire will cancel the other rules activations (stop them from firing).
The Activtion group attribute is any string, as long as the string is
identical for all the rules you need to be in the one group.
NOTE: this used to be called Xor group, but technically its not quite an
Xor, but you may hear people mention Xor group, just swap that term in
your mind with activation-group.
JLL
Bynum, Joe wrote:
All,
I'm trying to setup three rules to process orders as a test case. The
first two rules look for specific conditions and the third one is the
default rule. I only want a single rule to fire for each order that I
pass into the engine. I gave all three rules the same
activation-group.
The first two rules have a salience of 10 and the third rule has the
default salience value. The problem that I'm experiencing is that
only one order is processed and the rest are skipped.
Here's a snippet from the rules file:
rule "837621 - Stage 5"
activation-group "Harris"
salience 10
when
flowid is 1798
workflow in stage "5"
then
assign prov plan "Harris Gtwy-ChXchange-New Loop"
complete task "FAC VER"
end
rule "828257 - New Order"
activation-group "Harris"
salience 10
when
flowid is 1798
workflow in stage "1"
then
assign prov plan "Harris Gtwy-ChXchange-New Loop"
end
rule "1798 Default"
activation-group "Harris"
salience 0
when
flowid is 1798
then
assign prov plan "Harris Gtwy-ChXchange-New Loop"=
end
Any Ideas?
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/activation-group-tf3631850.html#a10142866
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users