If it's stored in a fact field of type int: yes.
The way you write it: no.
-W
On 25 March 2011 18:37, Benson Fung <benson.redhat(a)gmail.com> wrote:
If the age is String type, can I use Integer.parseInt(age) to change
to integer and then evaluate it?
like
when
ad : ApplicationData(Integer.parseInt(age) < 0)
then
ad.setReturnMsg("age should not be negative 0")
end
2011/3/26 Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com>:
> Sorry, I don't use guided editors.
> -W
>
> On 25 March 2011 18:17, Benson Fung <benson.redhat(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Wolfgang,
>>
>> I managed to author this rule(ApplicationData( age == null || age ==
>> "" )) via Technical Rules editor of BRMS.
>> However, I cannot create this rule via Business Rule Guided Editor of
>> BRMS.
>>
>> Could you let me know how?
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> 2011/3/26 Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com>:
>> > You can't use a method call as the left hand side operand in a
>> > constraint;
>> > thus
>> > age.size() == 0
>> > is not correct.
>> >
>> > Do you really mean
>> > age == "null"
>> >
>> > Probably
>> > ApplicationData( age == null || age == "" )
>> > is the right thing to do, provided that ApplicationData.age is a
String.
>> >
>> > -W
>> >
>> > On 25 March 2011 17:32, Benson Fung <benson.redhat(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I got the following rule problem.
>> >>
>> >> The rule is like :
>> >>
>> >> 1. | rule "Rule1"
>> >> 2. | dialect "mvel"
>> >> 3. | when
>> >> 4. | ad : ApplicationData( age == "null"
,
>> >> age.size()
>> >> == 0)
>> >> 5. | then
>> >> 6. | ad.setReturnMsg( "age should not be null
or
>> >> empty"
>> >> );
>> >> 7. | end
>> >>
>> >> where setReturnMsg is a method of ApplicationData Fact();
>> >>
>> >> However, I got the validation error :
>> >>
>> >> [Rule1] [ERR 101] Line 4:49 no viable alternative at input ')'
in
rule
>> >> "Rule1" in pattern ApplicationData
>> >> [Rule1] [ERR 102] Line 4:51 mismatched input '==' expecting
')' in
>> >> rule "Rule1" in pattern ApplicationData
>> >>
>> >> Please help what the problem is.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Thanks
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> rules-users mailing list
>> >> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> >>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rules-users mailing list
>> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users