Re: [rules-users] DSL and 5.3 Final

Having the following DSL statement coded: [condition][]- where {VarName} is {AttributeName} and is {operator} {value}={VarName}: {AttributeName} {operator} {value} DSLR looks like this: ThereIsProgramHistoryData - where $var01 is LevelPriorYear and is greater than 0 DSL parses to this: ProgramHistory ($var01: levelPy > 0) Parsed just fine in 5.2 Final. Downloaded 5.3 today but am now getting following error for every rule that uses the above DSL: "no viable alternative at input ','" The DRL looks like this : ProgramHistory ( , $var01: levelPy > 0) What changed in 5.3 that is causing the comma to be inserted? Any help is much appreciated! -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/DSL-and-5-3-Final-tp3869806p3869806. html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users