Re: [rules-users] Identical Facts over rules, results being cached?
If it's general enough, it is not something to be shrugged off as "not
that hard".
You'll have to keep the fact and memorize all rules it fires, and
create a mechanism that'll let you call right hand sides when the
duplicate fact
arrives and with all variables bound to the same values. Huh!
-W
On 09/04/2014, Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The question here is: what is the result of fireAllRules()? Caching
the
result of this method is trivial: it's just a number! I think that what you
need to build is your own ad-hoc cache that knows how to extract a 'result'
out of the session an keep it handy. Implementing this mechanism shouldn't
be that hard (at least for simple - no nested- Facts) and once you have it
you can validate the benefits.
Regards,
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Esteban Aliverti
- Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Leonard93
<leonardlindenau(a)hotmail.com>wrote:
> Wouldn't that depend on how long the data is being kept and how often
> identical rules are being fired?
>
> Or would you say the rule engine is faster than all the actions in
> between
> that it wouldnt matter?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
>
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Identical-Facts-over-rules-results-bein...
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>