Cool. I was showing the ruleflow and BRMS to some of the guys at work
yesterday, and the fact that the ruleflow was not available in the BRMS was
one of things they all raised. Apologies for not checking the JIRA first -
that's what I get for replying to emails when I really should be in bed.
Regards
Shahad
On 5/15/07, Anstis, Michael (M.) <manstis1(a)ford.com> wrote:
Erm, I'd already raised a JIRA for rule flow support in the BRMS:-
Provide RuleFlow editing capabilities within JBRMS
--------------------------------------------------
Key: JBRULES-851
URL:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-851
Project: JBoss Rules
Issue Type: Feature Request
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Reporter: Michael Anstis
Assigned To: Mark Proctor
------------------------------
*From:* rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:
rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Shahad Ahmed
*Sent:* 15 May 2007 00:37
*To:* Rules Users List
*Subject:* Re: [rules-users] Using the Rule Flow Builder GUI
Mark, Kris, Thanks for the replies.
>1) Yes kris is still working on the decision stuff for ruleflow. >Some of
the stuff is already partially implemented, but an (X)OR split (where you
>can define which path(s) to follow based on some conditions) is still on
the TODO list.
I look forward to trying out the XOR decision node stuff. By the looks of
the code in the trunk, the core stuff isn't to far for completion.
>2) A rule currently can only belong to one ruleflow-group, but a
ruleflow-group
> can belong to multiple ruleflows ...
Reuse of ruleflow-groups is a good start, but allowing rules to belong to
more than one group is definitely worth considering at some point. I may
just give this a go and see what it looks like:) What I've found is that
when you use a decent BRMS (like the new BRMS in JBoss Rules) and have all
your rules in one place, then the potential for reuse really starts to
become apparent.
Incidentally, is there any merit to adding ruleflow management into the
BRMS, if only to allow them to be versioned and added to the repository.
Perhaps they could be an additional element to a package (i.e like
Business rules, models etc.). I can see that defining ruleflows is probably
not something that could be done easily (if at all) in the BRMS web app
itself.
>3) The Eclipse GUI ruleflow builder doesn't seem to allow loops in the
flow.
>It does support the creation of loops: create an XOR split as the
starting point
>of your loop, you can then always create nodes that link back to this
>starting point, resulting in a loop...
Kris, I assume you meant create an XOR Join (not Split) as the starting
point of the loop, in which case I can see how that would work - thanks.
Regards
Shahad
On 5/14/07, Kris Verlaenen <kris.verlaenen(a)cs.kuleuven.be> wrote:
>
> > 1) Yes kris is still working on the decision stuff for ruleflow.
> Some of the stuff is already partially implemented, but an (X)OR split
> (where you can define which path(s) to follow based on some conditions) is
> still on the TODO list.
>
> > 3) The Eclipse GUI ruleflow builder doesn't seem to allow loops in the
> flow.
> It does support the creation of loops: create an XOR split as the
> starting point of your loop, you can then always create nodes that link back
> to this starting point, resulting in a loop. Note that looping kind of
> depends on the (X)OR split as well, as that would allow you to exit the loop
> in specific conditions (now you will probably create an endless loop). I
> hope I'll be able to add that piece of functionality pretty soon to trunk.
>
> Kris
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users