Re: [rules-users] Implementing Refraction with Drools

Thanks for the feedback and the tip on the memory leak. I am using 5.4 distribution for my POC. I agree with your comments. These features need to be thought thru holistically and not piece meal. My understanding is that the execution control semantics will not be available till 6.x i.e. the repeatable semantics is not available in 5.4. implemented - 1. At a ruleset level and which can be injected into the engine at runtime for all rules in the ruleset, with default semantics that popular commercial engines support. 2. Rule level semantics that can be specified for specific rules. However from a Rule Architect perspective these are interesting and should have appropriate controls in the API and the technical rule language i.e. DRL to be able to control these. My humble two cents :) -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Implementing-Refraction-with-Drools-tp4... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.