Re: [rules-users] Drools 5.4 DSLR Stack Overflow

Thanks for the insight. I do have several lines of comments in this format so perhaps I will try and just change them all over to // for simplification as a test of this theory.. laune wrote > > The Pattern comments in org.drools.lang.dsl.DefaultExpander (defined > in line 63) is vulnerable when used against strings containing '/*' > followed by multiple repetitions of '*' alternating with other > characters before being terminated with '*/'. The pattern > > "(?:/\\*(?:[^*]|(?:\\*+[^*/]))*\\*+/)" > > isn't "best practice", but it shouldn't cause a stack overflow. > > The much simpler pattern > "/\\*.*?\\*/" > would serve the same purpose while not causing a stack overflow. > > Tested with javac 1.6.0_23 > -W > > On 09/07/2012, gboro54 <gboro54@> wrote: >> Even after updating to 1.6.0_31 we still get the following: >> >> Caused by: java.lang.StackOverflowError >> at java.util.regex.Pattern$GroupTail.match(Pattern.java:4227) >> [rt.jar:1.6.0_31] > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@.jboss > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-5-4-DSLR-Stack-Overflow-tp401855... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users