Re: [rules-users] Adding a custom operator to drools?
Hi Edson,
thanks for the quick reply...
Edson Tirelli wrote:
It depends if you are talking about Drools 4 or 5. You are right
about Drools 4. Drools 5 has "quasi-pluggable" operators... hehehe :)
Sorry, didn't mention it. I was talking about the 4.0.x series. This
leads to the following.
For more info, look at the EvaluatorDefinition interface in Drools 5
and its several implementations for examples.
Well, how stable and usable (eclipse integration?) is drools 5? (I am
using the drools rule engine mostly; not the BRMS)
While I may not need top notch stability and can cope with some changes
to the codebase over time ( research project ), Drools only is one part
of a pretty complicated application. So far, this was the major reason
for not having a closer look in the new version.
BTW, most important thing that I forgot to mention: we obviously
are
interested in feedback and contributions on the feature, from simple
ideas and suggestions to actual patches and improvements!
Well, we agree here. The previous two posts were ment to start some
discussion. Now - as I need this feature rather sooner than later - I am
looking into the implementation. JIRA ticket with more will follow if I
am sucessfull.
cu, Michael