Re: [rules-users] Guided Rule Editor doesn't list no-setter-fields if a fact is annotated

I'm not clear on what you are saying. We reflect the methods of existing beans:- * If the member has a getter it is available in the LHS * If the member has a setter it is available in the RHS * If the member has a getter and a setter it is available in both the LHS and RHS Members of declared types are available in both the LHS and RHS (as we implicitly create getters and setters). I don't understand "we should only support getters" but "be intelligent enough not to allow the setter to be used in the IDE". If we only support getters there is no setter; and if there is no setter how do we allow the user to set the value? Of course my comments are from a Guvnor perspective, if you mean to change the way declared types work, then... well, we'll have to change Guvnor anyway :) 2011/12/19 Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org <mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org>> On 19/12/2011 16:04, Michael Anstis wrote: > You are not mistaken. > > For POJO models we use reflection (class.getMethods) to determine > whether a Type's methods members are available in the LHS or RHS > or both, according to Java Bean conventions. Declarative models > have their members available in both the LHS and RHS by default > as we generate "getters" and "setters" for them. It probably looks like we should support only getters though, for existing beans. We just need to be intelligent enough not to allow the setter to be used in the IDE. Toshiya: Sounds like a great introduction task, you up for the challenge? Mark > > On 19 December 2011 05:47, Toshiya Kobayashi <tkobayas(a)redhat.com > <mailto:tkobayas@redhat.com>> wrote: > > Hello, > > In Guvnor 5.3.0, I can use CEP feature support in Guided Rule > Editor after uploading a class by "Upload POJO Model jar" and > annotating it in "New Declarable Mode". > > 1. | declare TestPojo > 2. | @role(value = event) > 3. | end > > But if some fields of the POJO class have only getter > methods, Guided Rule Editor won't list those fields in > "Modify constraints" popup. (if a field has a setter method, > it will be listed) > > public class TestPojo { > private String name; > public TestPojo() {} > public String getName() { return name; } > // public void setName(String name) { this.name > <http://this.name> = name; } > } > > Am I missing something? If it's not an expected behaviour, I > will raise a JIRA. > > Cheers, > Toshiya > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users