Re: [rules-users] Found solution vs actual optimum [planner]
Looks normal, no big bottleneck apparently.
It's probably time to blame the hardware :)
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html
Mine's around 4k there.
Keep in mind that: better hardware will give you the same solution twice
as fast,
but not necessarily a much better solution in the same time (which
better algorithms do tend to do).
Op 12-02-13 00:18, john poole schreef:
I went through and ran some stepLimit benchmarks, commenting out
single rules
at a time, or groups of rules that were dependent on each other. "average
calculate count per second" stayed fairly consistent at around 825 to 850,
except for the "consecutive working day" rules.( Which were already in the
drl file before I added mine, but do apply to the schedules I'm working on)
I commented out the group, then uncommented them in sequence.
Everything below a score is commented out:
1487(entire group commented out)
rule "insertEmployeeConsecutiveAssignmentStart"
1308
rule "insertEmployeeConsecutiveAssignmentEnd"
1244
rule "insertEmployeeWorkSequence"
1054
rule "minimumConsecutiveWorkingDays"
1081
rule "maximumConsecutiveWorkingDays"
988
rule "insertEmployeeFreeSequence"
994
rule "insertFirstEmployeeFreeSequence"
902
rule "insertLastEmployeeFreeSequence"
854
rule "insertEntireEmployeeFreeSequence"
938
rule "minimumConsecutiveFreeDays"
895
rule "maximumConsecutiveFreeDays"
851 (nothing commented out)
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Found-solution-vs-actual-optimum-tp4022...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users