Re: [rules-users] Error in Drools when clicking "Generate Task Form Template"

This may not necessarily apply to you but it's worth mentioning - both Designer, jBPM Console, and Guvnor assume by default they run on localhost:8080. If you have configured one or all to run on a different host/port you will have to make configuration changes. You can find how to do that for Guvnor and Designer here: http://docs.jboss.org/jbpm/v5.3/userguide/ch.designer.html#d0e4310 To change this default configuration in console: http://docs.jboss.org/jbpm/v5.3/userguide/ch.console.html#d0e4624. One of the things you can do is make sure that if you are not using the default configuration, you make the needed changes and make sure the three webapps can talk to eachother properly. I am not sure what version of jBPM you are using so will assume it is 5.3.0.Final; jBPM Console looks up available process definitions, and process assets first from the classpath, and then it queries Guvnor. So the Evaluation process you see console found it on the classpath as it is a process that's bundled with the console by default. When you click on the Processes tab in console, watch the logs closely, it should indicate some problems with either 1) it cannot connect to Guvnor, 2) It is unable to parse + load the bpmn2 processes, or 3) It is not even looking at the right Guvnor package your processes are located in (4) some other errors i'm not mentioning here :)) . Either way the server logs should be enough to pinpoint a possible issue. Another thing that you can do is in Guvnor go to the Administration section and go to Import/Export and export your repository (it will create a .zip file which includes a single .xml file). If you can attach this repository xml file here I will be able to possible reproduce the issue and help more. As far as your question about jBPM Console in general. I think it is a good tool. It has a lot of nice functionality like a rest api, authentication and a nice and easy to understand interface. It does have some limitations such as single session management and it's not really meant for HA/cluster scenarios..in those cases you could write your own front end to it if you wish, or contribute back to what we have now ..up to you :) Hope this helps. Tihomir On 8/7/12 6:00 PM, Sadiroveski wrote: