Re: [rules-users] [Drools Flow 5.1] Updating a process definition -> Proceed updates running processes
Greg, your guess is correct! The process instance is in fact persisted in db
for the period waiting for response in node 2.
Guys from dev-team, do you agree that this is a bug and should be filled in
Jira?
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Flow-5-1-Updating-a-process-defi...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.