Re: [rules-users] Resuming the Flow: SESSION_ID, PROCESS_INSTANCE_ID, WORKITEM_ID

By the way, Wait States are Node Instances, that are currently inside the ProcessInstance. Right? On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Mauricio Salatino <salaboy(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: > Did you see the new BPMN2 spec? > There is now such thing as a Generic Wait State. > > > On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 6:26 PM, tolitius <webakaunt(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > >> >> Mauricio, >> >> getThePersonAndTheDocumentThatIWant is a business concern. >> Specifically >> it relates to Documents and People >> >> my argument is that API such as: >> >> process.findWorkitemsInWaitState (maybe a bit better worded) is a >> framework concern, since a WAIT_STATE and a WORK_ITEM are workflow [not >> necessarily Drools ] DSL. Not business. Do you see what I mean? >> >> I don't see me not following your suggestions, and I appreciate the >> discussion, I just don't understand why the WAIT_STATE is not a framework >> concern. >> >> /Anatoly >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://n3.nabble.com/Resuming-the-Flow-SESSION-ID-PROCESS-INSTANCE-ID-WOR... >> Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-users mailing list >> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> > > > > -- > - http://salaboy.wordpress.com > - http://www.jbug.com.ar > - Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio - > -- - http://salaboy.wordpress.com - http://www.jbug.com.ar - Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -