Re: [rules-users] Compound DSL statements

I tried creating a DSL something like the following:- [when] there is a QQ with attr equal to {YYY} = there is a Q - with attr equal to {YYY} [when]there is a Q = Question() [when] - with attr equal to {YYY} = attr == "{YYY}" but I find that the expansion does not seem to work right. When I use this like when there is a QQ with attr equal to abc then ... What this expands to is Question() attr == "abc" I was hoping that the condition would be put inside the pattern. Is it not possible to make "compound" DSL statements that use inline "-" clauses? Chris Selwyn _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users