Because the annotation should extract most of the unstructured information, into a
structured object. So if there is optionally such an information like an anatomic side, I
would want to add this information to my structured object.
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
Von: "Wolfgang Laun" <wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com>
An: "Rules Users List" <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
Gesendet: Montag, 14. Januar 2013 12:22:37
Betreff: Re: [rules-users] Hello and my first question
I take "optional" to mean "don't care whether it is there or not"
- so
why don't you simply omit this condition?
-W
On 14/01/2013, Bojan Janisch <bojan.janisch(a)scai.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
Hello everybody,
this is my first post and also my first question to you.
I've searched the net for quite some hours now, but don't get any
information regarding optionally conditions.
I'm using drools to annotate some textobjects and I'm stucking with the
following rule:
When there are two named entities, one body side and one anatomy in a text
(they're defined earlier by a textannotating system, so I'm working on
annotated objects) and there is a optionally anatomic side (it contains
generally something like "lateral" oder "medial" and so on), then
generate
me a new annotation.
So up to now I'm on this state:
Rule "Anatomic Side"
when
$NE1 : NE(Type.contains("body"))
$NE2 : NE(Type.contains("anatomy"))
//So here starts the problem
[$NE3 : NE(Type.contains("anatomic"))]
then
...
How can I set a condition as optionally or is there no such way?
Thanks everyone to who reads this.
Janisch
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users