Op 10-03-11 09:27, Ansgar Konermann schreef:
Hi Geoffrey,
On 10.03.2011 08:58, Geoffrey De Smet wrote:
> There's a jira for a maven-drools-plugin with possible requirements
> and I believe there already 2 implementations in the wild.
>
> IMHO:
> 1) It should be centralized into the droolsjbpm-tools repository.
> Make a pull request on that repository and I 'll peer review it.
>
It's ASL licensed - if you feel like it, fork it, pull it, do whatever
you like under this license. My team and I needed a starting point and
we found it too complicated to work with the drools source code
repository during the last few months/weeks.
Understandable.
The big changes are done, so
the drools source code repository should be stable any day now :)
Watch the lights on hudson:
https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/view/Drools%20jBPM/
> 2) The goals etc should follow maven naming conventions.
> 3) There should be integration tests.
> 4) It should use the latest maven 3 best practices.
>
> In short: it's best to start from a really good, existing, up-to-date,
> ASL-licensed other maven plugin that does non-java compiling.
>
Is this just a write-down of your thoughts with no relation to the
implementation described on the given web page, or should it actually
referr to the given implementation?
Just a quick write down of my thoughts,
I haven't had the change to check your implementation yet.
Sorry for the confusion.
Afaik, from maven 2 to maven 3, a lot of the plugin infrastructure has
been deprecated and replaced
by new API's (aether, it testing, ...), so I was wondering if the plugin
takes advantage of those things (if appropriate).
If it should be the latter, could you be a bit more concrete (except
for
maybe point 1)? Admitted, I'm new to maven plugin development, but I
tried hard and thus can't see where points 2 to 4 are violated. If there
are any points to be improved, I'd be glad to fix them, given some
pointers to relevant information and a ticket in the bug tracker (also
linked from the web page).
Best regards
Ansgar
> Op 09-03-11 22:42, Mauricio Salatino schreef:
>
>> I will take a look on that right now..
>> I was planning to do the same for some of my example projects.
>> I will come back with some feedback!
>> Greetings.
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Ansgar Konermann
>> <ansgar.konermann(a)googlemail.com
>> <mailto:ansgar.konermann@googlemail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I prepared a tiny drools compiler plugin for Maven 3. It currently
>> contains the smallest feature-set which is potentially useful for my
>> colleagues at work, so up to now it's no more than a starting
>> point for
>> my team. Nevertheless, I invite you to take a look at it, comment
>> on it
>> and suggest features _you_ would like to see in the plugin in one
>> of its
>> future releases.
>>
>> There's some inital documentation here:
>>
http://passion.forco.de/content/maven-drools-plugin
>>
>> Looking forward to your comments.
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Ansgar
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users@lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> - CTO @
http://www.plugtree.com
>> - MyJourney @
http://salaboy.wordpress.com
>> - Co-Founder @
http://www.jbug.com.ar
>>
>> - Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
With kind regards,
Geoffrey De Smet