Re: [rules-users] Is Flow / jBPM dying on the vine?

Hi, I am considering using drools with Flow/jBPM as an integral part of a corporate solution. However, it seems to me like the project is dying on the vine. I understand the code is still being worked but overall interest seems to be waning; evidenced by things like, a (...the) jBPM 5 book due two months ago is still MIA. No blog posts on the project for six weeks. I don't mean to bash jBPM, but am just worried about it's future. I suppose the Flow/jBPM merge is irreversible? Any thoughts? Is anyone using another BPM system with drools? Thanks, -J -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Is-Flow-jBPM-dying-on-the-vine-tp402073... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users