Re: [rules-users] Anyone know any reason not to replace mvel2-drools4 with mvel2-beta6 jars in Drools 5.3.0.Final?
ndipiazza wrote
Related to posts:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-5-2-performance-building-Knowled...
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/time-loading-rules-into-knowledgebase-g...
In Drools 5.3.0.Final, I noticed that when loading rules package, there
seems to be a big time and memory gain between mvel2-beta6 jar versus
mvel2-drools4 jars.
Has anyone seen or know of any problems with using the mvel2-beta6 jars
that we might encounter?
The mvel 2.1 beta's are actually older then most of the mvel 2.1 drools
releases. Check nexus timestamps.
The versions are indeed not maven/osgi conflict resolution compatible (they
are not alfabatically comparable ordered), but as long as mvel doesn't
release 2.1.0.Final there's little we can do.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Anyone-know-any-reason-not-to-replace-m...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.