RE: [rules-users] controling rule execution
Another way to do it is a combination of salience and retraction. The
parent rule would have a higher salience value and then retract the
facts in its consequence
Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Greg Barton
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 11:22 PM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] controling rule execution
A combination of higher priority parent rules with a custom agenda
filter, activated when the parent rule fires, that prevents the child
rule from firing.
Just a guess.
So, after the child rule is initially prevented from firing, can it be
reactivated? If so, when and under what conditions?
--- On Thu, 10/30/08, techy <techluver007(a)gmail.com> wrote:
From: techy <techluver007(a)gmail.com>
Subject: [rules-users] controling rule execution
To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
Date: Thursday, October 30, 2008, 11:18 PM
Hello,
I would like to have the rules parent/child structure. I
don't want the
child rules to be executed when parent's conditions
are true(i.e
consequence is executed) even if child's conditions
are true. How Can I
achieve that in drools?
Please clarify.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/controling-rule-execution-tp20260028p20260028.html
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users