Hi,
I saw your last update a little late :-)
If the looping is the problem, just add the no-loop attribute to the rule. I
got the same mistake just recently.
Regards,
Frank
FrankVhh wrote:
Hi,
Does the result of your ruleset seem to be ok to you?
Maybe you could post some snippets of your code. An example of a rule will
suffice as drl. Regarding to the java, the snippet of code where the
tracking variable is declared and maybe even the "aftermath" (What happens
after the ruleset is executed)
Regards,
Frank
Shobhit1 T wrote:
>
> Hi frank,
>
> I tried what you just told. It goes into an infinite loop after updating.
> and control remains in the drl.
>
> Regards,
>
> Shobhit
> =====-----=====-----=====
> Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
> message and/or attachments to it may contain
> confidential or privileged information. If you are
> not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use,
> review, distribution, printing or copying of the
> information contained in this e-mail message
> and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If
> you have received this communication in error,
> please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and
> immediately and permanently delete the message
> and any attachments. Thank you
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Can-we-return-values-...
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.