Re: [rules-users] Drools: Compound Value Restriction in Decision Table

Hi, I am pocing/learning drools and I am trying to implements Compound Value Restrictions using 'In' in a decision table. I can do this in a rule like rule "CoverType Example" when $risk : Data( coverType in ("A","B", "C", "D")) then result.add("CoverType was one of A, B C or D"); end I can also implement this in a decision table in a long winded fashion Condition, Action Data, result coverType, add("$param") A, CoverType was one of A, B C or D B, CoverType was one of A, B C or D C, CoverType was one of A, B C or D D, CoverType was one of A, B C or D Is there a compact way to do this using a Compound Value Restriction using in? Something like: Condition, Action Data, result coverType in, add("$param") "A,B,C,D", CoverType was one of A, B C or D What goes in the script part "coverType in"? The number of items in the list can be variable, so don't want to write something that has $1, $2, $3, $4 Thanks David _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users