Re: [rules-users] RuleFlow only calling first RuleFlowGroup when called through drools-server

I am new to Drools and I am having the exact same problem. Have you found any resolution yet? How are you starting the ruleflow? I'm creating a StartProcessCommand object and adding it to the BatchExecution Command. I am not sending a FireAllRules command as this seems to make the rules fire independently of the flow. Basically I do something like this: //create an insertCommand object and insert the passed in fact model into it. InsertObjectCommand insertCommand = (InsertObjectCommand) CommandFactory.newInsert(factModel); insertCommand.setObject(factModel); //set the out identifier. This is a string that will be used to identify //this particular fact model in the execution result response. insertCommand.setOutIdentifier(factHandle); insertCommand.setEntryPoint("DEFAULT"); //not sure what this does. //tell the drools server to pass the fact model back to the client //as part of the response insertCommand.setReturnObject(true); StartProcessCommand startProcessCommand = new StartProcessCommand(); startProcessCommand.setProcessId(processId); commandList.add(startProcessCommand); //add the command to the passed in array list commandList.add(insertCommand); BatchExecutionCommand batchCommand = CommandFactory.newBatchExecution(commandList,knowledgeSession); //Use the BatchExecutionHelper class to convert the batch command to an XML stream to be sent to the //drool-server's rest api. String commandXML = BatchExecutionHelper.newXStreamMarshaller().toXML(batchCommand); Then I send the commandXML to the server using HttpClient. Is this similar to what you do? -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/RuleFlow-only-calling... Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.