Re: [rules-users] Regression 5.1->5.2 with conflicting ClassNames

I second that problem. Switching from Drools 5.1 to 5.2 or 5.3 brought issues that were resolved by fully qualifying fact names. Here are samples illustrating the problem: *Sample1:* *Sample2:* *Sample3 (continues Sample2 as the following is in the same DRL file):* Like thomas, adding namespace where there was a name conflict resolved the issues. However, something seem to go wrong when parsing and, sometimes, executing. Alexis -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-Regression-5-1-5-2-with-con... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.