Bagwell, Allen F wrote:
That's not so welcome news. Our old rule engine software had this
ability. We'll find a work-around, but is this being considered in a later update to
Drools? My thought is that rule should be like method: you really should only need to
write it once.
no plans to add this, especially as ruleflow is the preferred way to
orchestration rules so that's where our focus is these days. Which is
your old rule engine that supported this? I don't believe jess or clips
allow a rule to live in multiple modules - which is what AgendaGroups is
based on.
Mark
-A
-----Original Message-----
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On
Behalf Of Mark Proctor
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 12:07 PM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] More than one agenda group for a rule?
Bagwell, Allen F wrote:
> I was wondering (hoping) that there is a way to put a rule into more
> than one agenda group?
>
> I've tried writing:
>
> rule "example"
> agenda-group "process x stuff"
> agenda-group "process y stuff"
> when
> (blah, blah, blah)
> then
> (blah, blah, blah)
> end
>
> But while the compiler has no problems with this it really only
> includes the rule in the last agenda-group listed.
>
nope, not possible.
> Thanks,
> Allen
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users