Re: [rules-users] fireUntilHalt() is halt forever
You are not writing rules - you are using rules to disguise the fact
that you are using if statements to process your data.
What is "droolsRequest" and how is it declared? If this were a real rule,
it would be
when
DroolsRequest( address.stateCode == "MA" )
then
...
no-loop is nonsense in a rule that doesn't update any WM data.
-W
On 21 August 2012 17:00, Rana <ven12344(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Here is the example
rule "AndroGel Provider State"
no-loop true
salience 95
agenda-group "AndroGel"
when
eval( droolsRequest.address.stateCode == "MA" )
then
logging();
drools.halt();
end
the other rule is very similar but for a different Agenda Group
rule "Pradaxa Provider State"
no-loop true
salience 95
agenda-group "Pradaxa"
when
eval( droolsRequest.address.stateCode == "MA" )
then
logging();
drools.halt();
end
In this case it is firing the Pradaxa rule and giving me the wrong output.
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/fireUntilHalt-is-halt-forever-tp4019146...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 2.2 KB)