Re: [rules-users] rule infinitely loops, appears to be depending on naming on variable

In my opinion to have a Java Bean (or a DRL type declaration that is exactly the same for what regards this issue) with more than 20 fields is a code smell and however something very hard to maintain. I must admit that I've been tempted to use an int as bitmask when I developed that feature, but in the end I decided to go with a long thinking that in this way I could be sure to cover everybody's needs. Evidently I was wrong. That said I will experiment developing a custom made BitSet to check if I can address this issue without paying a performance penalty. Indeed I wouldn't like to have a performance loss (together with an higher memory occupation) for something that I still consider an extreme edge case. So what I will do in the short term will be to just disable the property reactive feature for types with more than 64 fields and emit a compilation warning when this happens. Mario -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rule-infinitely-loops-appears-to-be-dep... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users