Re: [rules-users] Order of Execution on Messages
Agreed that "seems" is not from experience in this current endeavor. However
previous implementations it has been faster to insert multiple facts and
execute once rather then insert one at a time and execute... A proxy fact
may be a good idea....
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Order-of-Execution-on-Messages-tp378401...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.