RE: [rules-users] Re: Mixing dsl language and regular rule syntax in arule file
Thanks for the response. As I am sure you expected it worked!
Daniel Quinn
Fedex - Custom Critical
Software Specialist I
234.310.4090(x2586)
-----Original Message-----
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Matt Geis
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 12:34 PM
To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: [rules-users] Re: Mixing dsl language and regular rule syntax
in arule file
> Is it possible to mix dsl language and regular rule syntax in a
rule
file?
Absolutely. Last I checked, it was not documented, but you can see it
in the samples that ship with Drools. Your dslr file below has been
rewritten to support what you want to do. (The '>' character tells the
parser to not perform DSL expansion on a given line)
animal.dslr file
#created on: Mar 12, 2009
package com.fedex.cc.expertsystem.test
import com.fedex.cc.expertsystem.fact.*
expander animal.dsl
rule "Set dog's ownership"
no-loop
when
There is an animal lover and dog in the system
then
The person owns the dog
end
rule "Tell us person doesnt like dogs"
when
person : Person(animalLover == false)
then
System.out.println("Person does not like dog");
end
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users