Re: [rules-users] Drools' use of hashCode

Ok Thanks for your answer. I just looked more closely, and actually it looks like what I was doing just can't work this way: when I update the father in rule 1, then I can't join it with its GdFather anymore without updating it too, am I right? Or I would have to use eval(father==$father) instead of simply father==$father which uses equals() and hashCode(), but then I'll lose all the performance? -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-Drools-use-of-hashCode-tp30... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.