Re: [rules-users] semantically equivalent DROOLS L-value expressions?

Thanks. I'm sure that it is my lack of DROOLs maturity that leaves me kind of bewildered at the need to re-factor R2 as R2a and R2b. Frankly, I'm even a little confused as to why R1 is not syntactically correct (it would be my "newbie-preferred" way of expressing my understanding of what I want the rule to "say"). Will play with and exercise your R2 re-factor recommendation, I'm willing to put in the DROOLs work until I "get it". Thanks again. Ben public class Message { private String businessDayConvention; private String _itemNumber; private String _clearingHouse; private String _productType; private String _currency; private String _upfrontFeeCurrency; private BigInteger _upfrontFeePaymentDate; private String _upfrontFeeSettlementConvention; private String _settlementConvention; private BigInteger _maturity; private BigDecimal _notional; private String _paymentFrequency; private BigInteger _rollDate; private String _calendar; private BigInteger _minimumEffectiveDate2Backload; private String _stubMinimumPeriod; private BigInteger _fixingRateDate; private String _initialStubRate; // rest is Eclipse generated gettr/settr methods } -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/semantically-equivalent-DROOLS-L-value-... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users