Re: [rules-users] Multi-threading inefficiency caused by static class synchronization?

Thank you. You are right the locks are guarding the session creation. I will try stateful session with fact retracting. I was using stateless session because the rules I'm going to deploy are all simple rules without much inference. So another question is: to make the multi-threading efficient, I need to reuse the stateful session. In that case, will the memory be a problem if I keep the session running too long without dispose it? Or I need to create a new session once every hour or day? Or maybe retracting the facts will keep the memory footprint low? -Ping -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Multi-threading-inefficiency-caused-by-... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.