Re: [rules-users] "in" syntax breaking the Rete Tree

@Mark, Thank you for your rant. When you get off your 'high-horse', you may want to consider the point which I was trying to make all along which is: All you or one of your team members had to do was to reply to my original post with four words only: "This is a bug". This would have saved a lot of your precious time and effort which you mention. It certainly is a lot quicker than writing your current heroic post and the repeated posts made by @laune. This would have cleared up my confusion as I did not know there was a disconnect between the code written in the text editor tab and the Rete Viewer tab. As far as I know, this fact is not documented anywhere either. If you had done that, I would have been satisfied and I could explain to others that this is a bug instead of "I don't know" and Drools Expert looking like a below enterprise-level product. I originally posted this bug on StackExchange so that I would capture a wider audience and get faster help but it was at the request of @laune that StackExchange was not the right place and that I should post it on this forum, which I duly did. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/in-operator-breaking-the-Rete-Tree-tp40... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.