Yes, there are. I work (as external consultant) for a few of those,
which I am not allowed to disclose here...
But: A decision pro/con Drools should be based upon YOUR specific
criteria, not those of other enterprises, right?!
In my experience, Drools is both stable and performant enough
to be used in productive environment. We tested several deployment
and architecture variants (esp. for batch processing),
with <100 Rules and <10 facts for each data-row within our batches,
but a few million rows. Worked out fine.
We currently use 3.0.6, no major issues.
regards,
Gernot
Is there any companies which used Drools successfully ?
Tell us more about your experiences, I need it to make decision
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Entreprise-using-Drools-with-success-tf4101493.html...
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Dr. Gernot Starke
Willi-Lauf Allee 43, D-50858 Köln
Tel. +49 (0) 177 - 728 2570
Mail: gs(a)gernotstarke.de
http://www.gernotstarke.de
http://www.arc42.de