Re: [rules-users] Writing a pattern in which each event constraint depends on the previous event

On 30 January 2011 12:55, OlliSee <o.roess(a)seeburger.de&gt; wrote: You sure do, but the question is whether you get them in this order during processing by accumulate. There is no documentation that accumulate passes through a set of selected facts in the order they were inserted. It could just as well be the (random) order of some hash key, or reverse, or whatever. -W