Re: [rules-users] semantically equivalent DROOLS L-value expressions?

attrA = "foo"

Hi, I am a DROOLS newbie. I apologize if this has been asked before. This rule (R1) is not syntactically correct in the Eclipse .DRL view. rule "R1" when Message( ((attrA = "foo" && _attrB == "bar") || AttrA== "foo") //syntax error (curious, why?) ) then System.out.println( "R1 pattern-matched Message. DROOLS Consequence executing now." ); end but R2 is syntactically correct = rule "R2" when Message( attrA = "foo" && _attrB == "bar") || Message (AttrA== "foo") then System.out.println( "R2 pattern-matched Message. DROOLS Consequence executing now." ); end In Drools 5.2, are R1 and R2 semantically equivalent? View this message in context: semantically equivalent DROOLS L-value expressions? Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users