Re: [rules-users] Drools Workflow functionality related doubt.

Hi, Most of this information can be found in one of the various Drools Flow documentation chapters. Quoting Pardeep.Ruhil(a)lntinfotech.com: I suppose you are referring to different human actors? Human tasks can be assigned to different users or groups. Related to human tasks, only person that have the right to perform certain actions on a specific task. If you are referring to more generic process methods (like starting processes etc.), you will have to make sure you only expose those methods to persons who are allowed to execute these methods. content objects and maintain version history? Drools Flow can access any information that is available, either directly by offering it as a process variable when starting the process, or by making it available as data that is part of the working memory. That also makes it very easy to respond to state changes of data (I assume this is what you refer to when talking about version history). possible? You should probably try to make your processes as declarative as possible. But you can basically interact with any external service using the pluggable work items, or by specifying the logic in a action node. If you need to access a RDBMS for evaluating constraints, you might want to take advantage of the rule integration and use the from keyword. If you are talking about human tasks, notifications and escalation could be specified. More generically, you could use rules to augment your process with any logic you require, so this makes it easy to specify conditional actions. driven programmatically. Communication with external systems should be done using pluggable work items. The engine also offers an API (defined in drools-api) to manage the various process instances. Kris Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm